Teaching As a
Subversive Activity

Neil Postman & Charles Weingartner, 1969

An Interactive Book Review

In order to be a great writer a person must have a built-in, shockproof crap detector. β€” Ernest Hemingway
πŸ“š Buy on Bookshop

πŸ’© The Crap Detector

The book's central metaphor: intellectual progress is a history of "crap detecting" β€” identifying misconceptions, propaganda, and faulty assumptions. The most subversive skill: viewing your own culture as an anthropologist would.

None of us is free of prejudice, but it is the sign of a competent 'crap detector' that he is not completely captivated by the arbitrary abstractions of the community in which he happened to grow up.β€” Postman & Weingartner
Score: 0 / 0

πŸŽ“ The Classroom Analyzer

The book catalogs what students actually do in traditional classrooms vs. inquiry classrooms. Since "we learn what we do" (Dewey), the medium IS the message. Click any behavior to see why it matters.

🚫 Traditional Classroom

Teacher talks; students listen
Message learned: Passive acceptance is more desirable than active criticism. Your role is to absorb, not to think.
Teacher asks "Guess what I'm thinking" questions
Only convergent questions with predetermined Right Answers. Students learn that discovering knowledge is not their business β€” it belongs to authorities.
Students work to supply The Right Answer
Message: there is always a single correct answer to every question. This produces adults who can't say "I don't know" and politicians who give instant answers to questions they don't understand.
Subjects are discrete, segmented things
You "take" English and "have had" History β€” vaccinated against needing to think about them again. Knowledge comes in disconnected packages with no relationship to each other.
Students never make observations or formulate definitions
They never perform any real intellectual operations. Recall is presented as the highest form of intellectual achievement.
Students' own ideas and feelings are irrelevant
The hidden curriculum teaches that your feelings don't matter and your classmates' ideas are inconsequential. Authority trumps independent judgment β€” always.
Students ask only administrative questions
"How long should the paper be?" "Will this be on the test?" β€” never substantive questions. The most important intellectual ability humans have developed (question-asking) is actively suppressed.
Autocratic atmosphere prevails
Goodwin Watson: autocratic environments produce apathetic conformity, defiance, scapegoating, escape, and dependence on authority. Students learn they cannot learn.

βœ… Inquiry Classroom

Teacher rarely tells students what they "ought to know"
Telling deprives students of the chance to find out for themselves. The teacher's silence is not neglect β€” it's respect for the student's capacity to discover.
Teacher's basic mode is questioning β€” divergent questions
Not "Guess what I'm thinking" but genuinely open questions. The nature of a question determines the nature of its answer. Divergent questions produce divergent thinking.
Teacher does not accept a single answer
Pluralizes everything: not THE reason but THE reasons. Not THE meaning but THE meanings. Cultivates "It depends" thinking β€” the mark of a flexible mind.
Encourages student-student interaction
Avoids being the sole judge/mediator of idea quality. Students learn to evaluate ideas themselves β€” which is what they'll need to do for the rest of their lives.
Rarely summarizes or provides "closure"
Summaries terminate thought. Instead, the inquiry teacher states hypotheses, leaving the conversation alive. Learning doesn't end when the bell rings.
Lessons develop from student responses
Not from a predetermined logical structure. "Wrong answers" and false starts are the stuff of the best lessons. Psychological continuity replaces logical sequence.
Students define, question, observe, classify, generalize, verify
Real intellectual operations β€” the things actual thinkers do. Success is measured by the frequency and quality of questions asked, not answers memorized.
Open, non-authoritarian atmosphere
Watson: open environments produce self-confidence, originality, self-reliance, enterprise, and independence. This IS learning how to learn.
There can be no significant innovation in education that does not have at its center the attitudes of teachers, and it is an illusion to think otherwise.β€” Postman & Weingartner

❓ What's Worth Knowing?

Suppose all syllabi, curricula, textbooks, and standardized tests disappeared. What if the entire curriculum consisted of questions β€” questions worth seeking answers to from the students' point of view? "Children enter school as question marks and leave as periods."

Once you have learned how to ask questions β€” relevant and appropriate and substantial questions β€” you have learned how to learn and no one can keep you from learning whatever you want or need to know.β€” Postman & Weingartner

πŸ”„ The Medium Is the Message

McLuhan's insight applied to education: the invention of a dichotomy between "content" and "method" is both naΓ―ve and dangerous. The critical content of any learning experience is the method through which learning occurs. Not what you say to people but what you have them DO.

Experience the same topic β€” "What is democracy?" β€” delivered two ways:

The Lecture on Democracy

Democracy is a form of government in which power is vested in the people. The word derives from the Greek dΔ“mokratΓ­a, meaning "rule of the people." Key features include: (1) free and fair elections, (2) rule of law, (3) protection of individual rights, (4) separation of powers.

Please memorize these four features. They will be on the test Friday. The correct answer to "What is democracy?" is: "A form of government in which power is vested in the people through free elections, rule of law, individual rights, and separation of powers."

Chapter 7, pages 142-168. Minimum 500-word essay due Monday.

What you just learned: That democracy is a set of facts handed down by authority. That your job is to memorize and reproduce them. That the "right answer" already exists. That your own experience of (or questions about) democracy is irrelevant. The medium taught you to be passive.
"The medium is the message" implies that the critical content of any learning experience is the method or process through which the learning occurs.β€” Postman & Weingartner, extending McLuhan

The Hidden Curriculum: 8 Messages Every Classroom Teaches

Click to reveal what students actually learn from classroom structure…

  1. Passive acceptance is more desirable than active criticism
  2. Discovering knowledge is beyond the power of students
  3. Recall is the highest form of intellectual achievement
  4. The voice of authority is to be trusted more than independent judgment
  5. Your own ideas and your classmates' ideas are inconsequential
  6. Feelings are irrelevant in education
  7. There is always a single, unambiguous Right Answer to a question
  8. Each "subject" exists independently of all other subjects

These messages are learned not from what teachers say, but from what students are made to DO. The ostensible "content" is forgotten by the next quiz. The structural lessons last a lifetime.

πŸ—£οΈ Languaging

Based on Sapir-Whorf, Korzybski, and Ames: language doesn't just express thought β€” it shapes perception. "Whatever we say something is, it is not." But also: "whatever we say something is, it IS β€” because we have said it." Click each pair to see the transformation.

E-Prime: Removing "To Be"

Korzybski noted that "is" statements project our perceptions onto reality as if they were facts. Rewriting without "to be" forces us to reveal the perceiver.

Standard English
"John is stupid."
"John performed poorly on the test I designed."
The "is" version pretends to describe John. The E-Prime version reveals: whose test? whose criteria? whose judgment? "Stupidity" is a grammatical category β€” it does not exist in nature.
Standard English
"That painting is ugly."
"I find that painting displeasing based on my aesthetic training."
The perceiver reappears. We don't GET perceptions from things around us β€” our perceptions come from US.
Standard English
"This is a free country."
"The government permits certain actions and restricts others, and I experience more permission than restriction in my daily life."
The clichΓ© dissolves into something examinable. A person in prison and a person on Wall Street both live in "a free country" β€” but the word "is" hides the difference.

Framing: Same Event, Different Language

How language selects what we "see" from the infinite complexity of reality.

Framing A
"The police officer neutralized the threat."
"The police officer shot and killed an unarmed 17-year-old."
Same event. Completely different perceptions. Korzybski: "The word is not the thing" β€” but we respond to words as if they are the thing. Both framings abstract selectively from reality.
Framing A
"Students failed the standardized test."
"The standardized test failed to measure what students know."
P&W: "We have to remember that what we observe children doing in schools is not what they ARE, but children exposed to us by our methods of teaching." The label tells us about the labeler.
Framing A
"He's a school dropout."
"He was pushed out by a school that had no use for him."
P&W on city schools: students who "drop out" actually comprise "an endless and growing population dedicated to 'getting even' with the society that has reviled and rejected them." Who dropped whom?
We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native language.… We cut nature up, organize it into concepts, and ascribe significance as we do largely because we are parties to an agreement to organize it in this way.β€” Benjamin Lee Whorf

🏫 The 16 Proposals

"Bizarre" proposals designed to make it impossible for teachers to function with old assumptions. Each one disrupts the perception that school-as-it-is is inevitable. Click to expand.

The trouble ain't that people are ignorant; it's that they 'know' so much that ain't so.β€” Josh Billings, quoted by P&W

πŸ“– Review

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†

A flamethrower disguised as an education book.

The Arc

The book moves in three clean stages: diagnosis (schools are broken β€” they teach passivity, obedience, and crap-absorption in a world that demands active, critical, crap-detecting minds), theory (the inquiry method, meaning-making, languaging β€” how people actually learn when you stop interfering), and practice (what to actually do Monday morning, from the 16 proposals to the 11 survival strategies).

The diagnosis is ferocious and still accurate. The theory is deeply grounded β€” Korzybski, Sapir-Whorf, Ames' perception studies, Dewey's transactional psychology. The practice sections are uneven but contain genuine brilliance (the "Quo Vadimus High School" method, Miceli's reality curriculum, the question-based curriculum).

It's from 1969. Some examples are dated β€” Vietnam, the specific racial politics, the gendered language. But the core argument is MORE relevant now, not less. In a world of algorithmic feeds, AI-generated content, and institutional collapse, "crap detecting" has gone from important to existential.

What Holds Up

  • The hidden curriculum analysis β€” students learn what they DO, not what they're told
  • Questions > Answers as a pedagogical principle
  • The environment/medium IS the curriculum
  • Language shapes perception β€” not metaphorically but literally
  • The Pygmalion effect / self-fulfilling prophecy research
  • The "seven obsolete concepts" still being taught (absolute truth, certainty, fixed identity, simple causality…)

What Doesn't

  • Sometimes too polemical β€” the Dr. Gillupsie satire is funny but heavy-handed
  • Vague on implementation beyond "be a different kind of person"
  • The educational games chapter aged poorly
  • Occasionally romanticizes student rebellion
  • The "every teacher is a language teacher" chapter needed to be the whole book

Connections

β†’ Mindstorms (Papert, 1980)

Papert built on this foundation. Where P&W made the political/cultural argument for inquiry learning, Papert provided the technological instrument (Logo, the computer as "object to think with"). Mindstorms gestures at the subversive argument but never makes it this explicitly. P&W are the political theory; Papert is the engineering.

β†’ The Little Schemer (Friedman & Felleisen)

The Socratic method in action β€” pure inquiry pedagogy applied to computer science. No declarative sentences. Only questions. Exactly what P&W prescribed. The Little Schemer IS a crap-detector training manual for programmers.

β†’ About Face (Cooper)

Design thinking = inquiry thinking. Cooper's insistence on understanding users before building = P&W's insistence on understanding learners before teaching. The "Dr. Gillupsie" satire could describe most software built without user research.

β†’ How to Solve It (PΓ³lya)

Heuristics vs. algorithms. PΓ³lya's method IS the inquiry method applied to mathematics: ask questions, look for patterns, work backward, check your assumptions. P&W want every subject taught the way PΓ³lya teaches math.

β†’ GΓΆdel, Escher, Bach (Hofstadter)

Systems thinking, self-reference, the limits of formal systems. GEB demonstrates what P&W's "open systems" look like intellectually β€” where every answer generates new questions, and the boundary between observer and observed dissolves.

The Bottom Line

The purpose of education is to help all students develop built-in, shockproof crap detectors as basic equipment in their survival kits.β€” Postman & Weingartner, final chapter

In 1969, this was radical. In 2025, when every feed is an algorithm, every headline is optimized for outrage, and AI can generate infinite plausible-sounding nonsense β€” it's a survival manual. The fact that schools STILL haven't listened is the strongest argument in the book's favor.

Read it alongside Mindstorms. One tells you why the revolution is necessary. The other shows you how to build the weapons.